Microsoft Project Online vs MS Project On Premise – Seavus Project Viewer

Looking for:

Microsoft project server 2016 license cost free. Microsoft Project Online vs MS Project On Premise

Click here to Download

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
This document covers licensing for an on-premises deployment of Project Server Project Online is an alternative Microsoft hosted. Ever wonder which MS Project product is best for you? This article explains the Microsoft Project licensing options for both cloud and.
 
 

 

Microsoft project server 2016 license cost free. Microsoft Project Licensing Explained

 

In addition, it is integrated with Microsoft Server SharePoint, One Drive and Skype for Business which empowers communication and improves coordination between project teams in the organization. All discussed MS Project on premise and Project Online versions are products of Microsoft, which is famous with its good customer support.

Microsoft offers rich knowledge base, how to content, community center, and video tutorials, with ability to contact customer support via email, chat or phone depends on the license agreement. Seavus Project Viewer also offers quality documentation, FAQ, video tutorial, webinars and ticket-based customer support system options. In addition, it offers a worldwide customer support to help with issues in 1 business day.

MS Project is one of the most advanced project management and PPM solutions in the market, it is not for beginners. For those who are familiar with project management, using Microsoft Project for them is not a big deal, relatively it is easy to use as it is similar to other Microsoft Products which are user-friendly.

Seavus Project Viewer on the other hand, has a similar user interface view of MS Project Desktop version, so it is easy to use and can be used comfortably by beginners.

Comparison Chart. Embed and provide credit to the original source by linking to it. With that said, it will be more convenient to you to add our conclusion as follows:. Seavus Project Viewer is available as a free day trial version. Following are an overview of the various versions: MS Project On Premise Project Standard MS Project Standard is a project management solution designed to be installed on a desktop on-premises , it supports schedule development, budgeting, task management, reporting.

Project Server It is a more advanced and sophisticated organization wide project portfolio management server solution. MS Project on-line Cloud-based In some features, there are some differences between Project Online and Project Server, but at the core, both perform the same functions.

Project Plan 1 Subscribers to Project Plan 1 is integrated with Project Online Essentials and can use a web browser to update project tasks, risks and issues. Project Plan 3 Project Plan 3 offers all features offered in Project Plan 1, in addition it offers to manage resources, and the ability to access and update projects using desktop fully installed client Each license covers up to 5 PCs of Project Professional Desktop App.

Project Plan 5 In addition to features offered by Project Plan 3, Project Plan 5 is more advanced where it offers portfolio and demand management and planning and management of enterprise resources.

Architectural and Database Access: MS Project on-premises Project Standard and Project Professional are used as a standalone desktop version as a personal project management tool. MS Project on-line Cloud-based Project Online is integrated with SharePoint and utilizes SharePoint features such as security groups, web parts and collaborative sites.

When the executive teams watch good reports to manage the portfolio projects, it’s easier to deploy the solution. My strategy is to do a pilot. Over two months, I may do ten projects. I’ll generate reports and deliver good information and the executive team of the steering committee can easily see the value for the company. Once the pilot shows the value to the steering committee, I usually have the go-ahead to continue the deployment in our organization.

We had five people for deployment and maintenance. It’s a good number. You need one person, that knows the information in regards to users and other people training the other people. There should be another person working on the cost measures such as the reports. I handle the implementation myself. I have a good amount of experience and therefore don’t need further experience.

I don’t need the help of integrators, resellers, or consultants. We’ve also looked at Planview and Jira. We found that the solution has better technical support on offer than other options. That said, I like Planview as it’s even less expensive than Project Server.

At the moment, I am in the process of deploying, the solution in more areas. I start with IT projects and telecom projects. Currently, I am working to introduce regular projects, marketing projects, product projects, etc.

I am working to introduce more areas in the Project Server environment. My organization handles IT consulting and services. That’s primarily how the organization is managed. That was why we were looking for a portfolio management product. We found that Project Server could be a way to visualize and govern the entire program for the client.

The solution has improved the organization primarily due to the transparency between each individual team. There is a productivity benefit. From a cost perspective, I’m less sure of how to comment. That said, productivity and transparency are definitely the two benefits I’ve witnessed so far. The most relevant feature is its collaboration capabilities. Users can easily collaborate, for example, on Sharepoint or Microsoft Teams.

If there is a lot of heavy usage of Microsoft tools, it’s easy to share and collaborate across apps. The deployment aspect of the product is a bit tedious. That’s something I personally see of my organization. Deploying Project Server from an infrastructure perspective is not an easy thing. It takes a week sometimes to set it up. From a features perspective, the insights around the cost and budget could be improved. Competitor products are more robust.

Project Server has a very limited feature in terms of reporting. Specifically, the features around the cost control are weak. The built-in reports and the built-in analytics for Project Server are very minimal.

The competitors are way ahead than what Project Server is offering us. The integration to an employee engagement platform probably would make more sense and integrations with other products like SAP would be useful. Users of Project Server need to write some amount of custom integrations to the DLP product innovation site. If you wanted to have resource analysis, you want to create invoices based on resources working on a project, that integration is still not there. Integrating with some of those invoice management systems would make more sense now based on the way enterprises are working in terms of automation.

The solution needs multi-language support. The tool primarily supports English as a primary language. If someone wanted to make it Arabic, the Project Server does not work well.

The characters sets, the dates, and other things create a lot of mess. When I was using the Project Server , that was creating a lot of problems in terms of performance, in terms of export, input, the content. However, when we moved to Project Server three years ago, I would say it was an improved version. It’s quite stable now. There have been a lot of technical advancements, and feature announcements. Primarily the solution has been handled by the PMO team which is comprised of 20 users.

They are mostly portfolio managers, program managers, and solution architects as well as an executive who usually uses it from a governance perspective.

Since this has been used by the portfolio managers, so it’s basically bread and butter for the PMO team. It’s used day in, day out and it’s tracking a single source of truth from a program management perspective. In terms of expanding the portfolio, likely, the business will grow, and that’s when we may add more users.

By , we might add five more users. That is what I foresee. We go through a CSP partner for Microsoft due to the online nature of the deployment.

Our CSP partner is quite helpful. We are pleased with the support quality they provide. I would rate them four out of five stars. The initial setup was complex. Any type of guidance or user training or helpful documentation and materials were not available. I will not be able to properly quantify what went wrong. I’m not sure if it was the infrastructure or the capacity planning or if the partner just wasn’t quite capable.

There could have been multiple issues. The general perception was that was supposed to happen within a day, maximum. It took around seven to nine all working days to just set up the environment. Since I was not managing the process, I can’t give feedback in terms of how the partner was to work with, or their capabilities. Although we began with the on-premises version, we’ve recently started using the online version of the solution. That is primarily how we access it now. From an advice perspective, for any enterprise that has an existing investment around Microsoft, it makes more sense in terms of moving to a Project Server to manage in a more structured way.

However, if you do not use SharePoint , if you do not use Microsoft Teams or any sort of solution that is the real value of Project Server it’s not necessary to use Project Server. This solution is best for those companies planning to have a commitment to Microsoft technology. It brings more value. I’d rate the solution at a seven out of ten.

It’s lacking some features around budget cost and portfolio management. There are a few areas that could use improvement still. We primarily use the solution to manage the project lifecycle. Generally the lifestyle starts at demand phase. We design a workflow according to customer’s needs.

The workflow starts with project ideation and project selection, if the project fits company criteria it will move onto the project management phase. Let’s say you have 10 projects and you don’t know which ones to move into actual project management phase. Customers use the portfolio and analysis feature of Project Server, and decide which project to do according to capacity planning if they have the resources and budget.

If the company has enough resources then its the projects with most benefit that gets selected. For the selected projects lifecycle will continue.

As it moves forward, you will get more project detail pages, more things to work with. This will also produce some reports as well. When it comes to integration with other systems Project Server falls short. There used to be out-of-box integration with TFS for example but with Project Server and forward that integration is deprecated.

There is room for improvement here. When it comes to project management itself, I’d like to see some hybrid solutions right now across the on-premises deployments especially. On-premise only has waterfall style project management. Project managers and team members can use Project for the web to plan and manage work of any size. Project for the web is built on the Microsoft Power Platform. Project for the web data is stored in CDS.

Further explanation below. Project Online provides powerful project management capabilities for planning, prioritizing, and managing projects and project portfolio investments—from almost anywhere on almost any device.

Project Online can be used by administrators, portfolio managers and viewers, project and resource managers, and team leads and members. Please note: MS Teams is a useful solution for instant messaging, video, IP telephony and online meetings. It has to be purchased separately, since it is not included in the Project Online service.

Our Sales Team will be happy to answer your questions. EN Deutsch English Francais. Project Online Essentials timesheets for time reporting. Work in the Cloud and on Your Own Project Server Team members with a Project Online Essentials license can carry out all the activities mentioned above on a Microsoft Project Server , or system on-premises as well as online. Foster Communication and Collaboration in Your Projects When working on projects, communication is a key success factor.

What a Project Online Essentials License Offers to Team Members Timesheets Enables team members to view timesheets, enter hours, add or remove tasks from timesheets and turn in timesheets. Learn more about Project Server licensing and software requirements.

If you are purchasing fewer than five copies of Project Professional or Project Standard , you may purchase them through resellers and retailers, such as the Microsoft Store.

For licenses acquired through Volume Licensing, the terms and conditions for how you can use the software are defined in the Commercial Licensing Terms and the Product List documents. Find information for: IT pros Developers.

 
 

Microsoft Project Server reviews, rating and features | PeerSpot

 
 

For us, our setup isn’t that fancy. It is just a single laptop deployment and we just deployed the solution to a couple of laptops. There was no complexity whatsoever. The enterprise version may be more complex to set up. You only need one person to manage the deployment process. In order to maintain it, you would only need one person who wouldn’t need to even be on it full time. The solution is only a single cost per seat. There isn’t a monthly or yearly subscription.

It’s only a few hundred dollars. It’s pretty inexpensive. I’d rate the solution nine out of ten due to the fact that it does have some limitations. Otherwise, it’s perfect. We noticed that there are some problems or issues working with it.

We are finding some workarounds to avoid them. We are not totally satisfied with that solution. It is related to the calculation of project duration, working hours, and so on. We think that calculations are not working correctly, and there is a need to enter data a couple of times in order to give the correct calculations. I’m not sure if there are any missing features. I can’t recall feeling as if something is lacking. The solution runs smoothly. It’s quite stable and reliable.

We don’t really see bugs or glitches. There aren’t crashes and it doesn’t freeze. We have been able to operate it without issues. It’s been good in that sense. The scalability of the product is quite good. If you need to scale it, you can do so. It shouldn’t be a problem. It is not my responsibility to contact technical support. I don’t have experience with them.

We have internal IT and their responsibility is to support the solution and to maintain everything. If there were issues, it would fall to them to contact technical support for the most part. Therefore, I can’t directly speak to the solution’s technical support response or capabilities.

I didn’t do the installation by myself. My colleague from our company did it instead of me. I’m not sure if the process is straightforward or difficult and I cannot speak to how long deployment took. I don’t have any experience with the pricing or licensing of the solution. I’m not sure what the costs are. It’s not a part of my job to worry about the licensing.

I don’t have experience with other project management tools. Maybe there are some better solutions, however, I’m not sure what those solutions are. I would recommend Microsoft Project to other organizations. In general, I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We’ve been largely happy with the product. It gives us good visibility into the amount of work needed for each person and how to delegate it appropriately. The working blocks within the solution are excellent.

I can follow four or five projects and see the dealine of items in the calendar. We can understand the amount of work – if it’s full or not – and we can plan a team member’s activities based on that. I’d like it if we could divide out the project calendars. On one project server, we might follow five projects or more at one time, and we’d like to see all of the items at once so that it becomes a long loop, but one where we can identify different projects in tandem and then focus on which we need to at the time.

While I only have visibility into one, I’d like to see several at a time. The solution is reliable. There aren’t glitches. There are no bugs. It doesn’t crash or freeze. It’s very stable. The solution is very scalable. If a company needs to expand the product they can do so quite easily. Our finance department handles the billing, therefore, I’m unsure as to if we pay monthly or yearly and what the overall costs are.

You can use it to build your schedule based on how you change your dates. This is how it actually builds the schedule. It needs to be more collaborative from inside the application. It only does project scheduling for me. It would be good if it could do other things and be more collaborative, such as sharing tasks for users.

It is not really incorporated into MS Office, so you can’t copy-paste stuff. It is on its own, doing its own thing. It is only used for scheduling, and it doesn’t work well with anything else. I have been using Project Server since it came out almost 20 years ago. In my current company, I have been using it for two years.

It seems to me that it is the standard for doing project scheduling, which is a shame. It should be used for more. You should be able to do more things with it because now it is not enough for people to just build a schedule and then use something else to do your daily planning.

I used to work for Microsoft, so I know how these things were built. I know some of the issues they have. It seems to me that it is a product that was built on its own.

It is very standalone, and it hasn’t been incorporated into the Office suite or other things that Microsoft products do. For example, we work a lot with Microsoft Teams.

Microsoft Teams would be a nice front end to an MS Project. Sign In. Post Review. Microsoft Project Server Reviews. What is Microsoft Project Server? We’re probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80, to 90, a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing.

As far as Project Online is concerned, we’re still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about , to , a year, but we’re getting a lot more capability out of it.

Filter by:. Filter Reviews. Analyst Firm. Cloud Provider. Comms Service Provider. Computer Retailer. Construction Company. Consumer Goods Company. Engineering Company. Financial Services Firm. Healthcare Company. Hospitality Company. Import And Exporter. Insurance Company. International Affairs Institute. Educational Organization. Legal Firm. Local Government. Logistics Company.

Manufacturing Company. Maritime Company. Marketing Services Firm. Media Company. Mining And Metals Company. Non Tech Company. Museum Or Institution. Music Company. Non Profit. Outsourcing Company. Paper And Forest Products. Performing Arts. Photography Company.

Political Organization. Printing Company. Program Development Consultancy. Religious Institution. Security Firm. Computer Software Company. Sports Company. Tech Company. Tech Consulting Company. Tech Services Company. Tech Vendor. Think Tank. Translation And Localization Position. Transportation Company. Wireless Company. Writing And Editing Position. Company Size. Self Employed. Job Level. C Level. Senior Manager. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management.

Broadcom Clarity PPM. Planview PPM Pro. Showing reviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters. David Tate, PMP. Project Manager at a computer software company with 5,, employees. Real User. Provides holistic reporting and allows us to keep track of what’s going on with projects. Pros and Cons. Basically, it sits on SharePoint. So, every time we create a project, a new project site is created within that SharePoint environment, which is a very good document repository.

It allows us to create issues and risks lists and additional functionality to keep track of what’s going on with projects. In the older on-prem versions, reporting was lackluster, to say the least. Project Online has a better handle on that. However, we will still be using Qlik Sense. We’re also looking at an add-on app from a company called OnePlan that adds some additional functionality where Microsoft is not as clean in its approach for things such as portfolio management and some of the trends analysis.

What is our primary use case? I work extensively with Microsoft Project Server. We are currently on the on-prem version, which is currently two versions back. We are in the process of migrating to Project Online, which will in the Microsoft cloud.

It gives team members a web interface to perform task and time updates to projects managed in Project Online. Microsoft Project Online desktop client is a project management program that features automated scheduling, project resource management, and built-in reporting.

Project Online desktop client can be used as a standalone application or it can connect to Project Online. Project Online desktop client is the subscription version of the Project Online desktop client and is available in Project Plan 3 and Project Plan 5 subscriptions.

We hope that brings some clarity to your decision-making process. Please reach out to us for demos, an analysis of your current and required licensing, or just to get your questions answered. Microsoft Project Licensing Explained. Microsoft Project Licensing My goal for this post is to present what we know today, which is good because the landscape has changed just recently.

Project Online desktop client Microsoft Project Online desktop client is a project management program that features automated scheduling, project resource management, and built-in reporting.

Subscription Plans Microsoft Project is available through the following subscriptions. Project Plan 1 is a new license, not a renaming of Project Online Essentials.

Watch the demo to see how you can more effectively manage your team, projects, and processes with real-time work management in Smartsheet. Watch a free demo. First of all let’s clarify the difference between Project Professional and Project Pro for Office Both are pretty similar products, except that Project Professional is an on-premise product and Project Pro for Office is a cloud product. While both versions are clients installed on your PC, the major difference is how they are updated.

If you have a Software Assurance agreement with Microsoft, you get new versions of Project Professional when new versions are launched by Microsoft typically, once every few years. With Project Pro for Office , you do not need to worry about manual updates. If you’ve enabled automatic updates, Microsoft will keep updating the installed client on your PC on a recurring basis.

Another major difference is number of installations. Typically, one license of Project Professional gives you the ability to install on one PC. One of the main reasons for choosing Project Pro for Office is the ability to connect it to Project Online. This enables you to gain insight into the portfolio-level view, and give View, Update, or Edit access to project team members. In addition to delivering portfolio-level capabilities, Project Pro for Office provides the ability to manage resources and collaborate with your team via Skype for Business.

Project Online is the product corresponding to Project Server, but in the cloud. It gives you the same abilities as Project Server with all the benefits of the cloud e. What about CALs? You can buy subscriptions of Project Online for as many users as you want. What if you already have a Project Server deployment and you want to test the waters in the cloud?

From a licensing perspective, Microsoft has made it easy for you to manage your projects in a hybrid world. You can access your existing Project Server deployment via a Project Online subscription. While Project Online is targeted at PMO and executives, how should you provide access to your many team members?

Project Lite is the product targeted at the team-level audience. In order to use Project Lite, you must have a subscription to Project Online. From a technical standpoint, Project Lite is exactly the same product as Project Online, but offered at a lower price point. From a licensing standpoint, Project Lite enables you to use a subset of capabilities. These capabilities allow you to view and edit timesheets, manage tasks, add issues and risks, and collaborate on project documents.

Targeted at project managers, Project Online bundled with Project Pro for Office enables you to add Project Online and Project Pro for Office in one transaction instead of two separate ones without any price discount. One question that comes up often is whether cloud services of Project are bundled with Office Plans. The answer is no. None of the Office Plans include subscriptions to Project. You can either purchase subscriptions to Project standalone or you can add them to your existing Office subscription.

If you have a subscription to an Office plan that is not listed above, your subscription to Project cannot be added to your existing Office subscription and will need to be added separately.

What if you already have a Project Server deployment and want to test the waters in the cloud? From a licensing perspective, Microsoft has made it easy for you to manage your projects in a hybrid setting. This visual guide provides a high-level overview of the various MS Project products, their licensing options, and dependencies. You can download a PDF version of the guide using the link below to reference when determining which MS Project product is right for you and your team.

One of the major reasons for choosing Project Professional is the ability to connect to Project Server. This enables you to gain insight into the portfolio-level view, and give View, Update, or Edit access to project team members via Project CAL.

You will need to upgrade to Project Professional to access Project Server. Depending on your licensing agreement, you may be able to purchase the upgrade SKU paying the price difference and not need a new Project Professional license.

Related posts